History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Samuel Jacobs v.
16-2319
| 4th Cir. | Jan 19, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel B. Jacobs, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Samuel B. Jacobs petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the § 2255 motion on December 6, 2016. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Jacobs’ motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Samuel Jacobs v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 19, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2319
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.