History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Lance Tew
16-7215
| 4th Cir. | Jan 19, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lance C. Tew, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South *2 Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Lance C. Tew appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tew’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Tew has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant Tew’s motion to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Lance Tew
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 19, 2017
Docket Number: 16-7215
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.