History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edward McMillan v. Mr. C. Jones
16-6418
| 4th Cir. | Jan 18, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward R. McMillan, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kari Russwurm Johnson, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Edward R. McMillan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McMillan v. Jones, No. 5:14-ct-03240-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Edward McMillan v. Mr. C. Jones
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 18, 2017
Docket Number: 16-6418
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.