*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MONEYCAT LTD., Appellant v.

EBAY INC., Appellee ______________________ 2016-1399, 2016-1405, 2016-1408 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00091, CBM2014-00092, CBM2014-00093.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ H OWARD N. W ISNIA , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glov- sky and Popeo, P.C., San Diego, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by S ANDRA B ADIN , Boston, MA; B RAD M. S CHELLER , New York, NY.

J ARED B OBROW , Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Red- wood Shores, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by B RIAN C HANG ; S COTT A NTHONY M C K EOWN , Oblon, McClel- land, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , W ALLACH , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT January 18, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court