History
  • No items yet
midpage
De'Ante Octario Howard v. Keith Kuhne
16-6924
| 4th Cir. | Jan 13, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

De’Ante Octario Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

De’Ante Octario Howard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. Kuhne, No. 5:13-cv-00062-FDW (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: De'Ante Octario Howard v. Keith Kuhne
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 13, 2017
Docket Number: 16-6924
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.