*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant v.

DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2016-1626 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00725.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ S TEPHEN M. S CHAETZEL , Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by D AVID S. M ORELAND .

J ENNIFER C. B AILEY , Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by A DAM P RESCOTT S EITZ .

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is *2 O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , T ARANTO , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT January 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court