History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Jamal Alfred
672 F. App'x 268
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal H. Alfred, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Jamal H. Alfred appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. [*] We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Alfred, No. 3:03-cr-00017-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] Although the district court granted Alfred’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Alfred’s sentence to the full extent he requested. 2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Jamal Alfred
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 22, 2016
Citation: 672 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: 16-7163
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.