*1 Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Gerard Montez Easiley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Easiley has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with *2 Case: 15-20339 Document: 00513804218 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016

No. 15-20339

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.