*1 Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Estrada- Zamarripa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Zamarripa has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Estrada-Zamarripa’s response. We concur with counsel’s *2 Case: 16-40307 Document: 00513804545 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016

No. 16-40307

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.