History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kenneth Sweeting v. Doctor Ulep
16-7199
| 4th Cir. | Dec 20, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Darniel Sweeting, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Darniel Sweeting appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweeting v. Ulep, No. 2:14-cv-00157-AWA- RJK (E.D. Va. June 29, 2016 & Aug. 15, 2016). We deny Sweeting’s motions to compel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Kenneth Sweeting v. Doctor Ulep
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 20, 2016
Docket Number: 16-7199
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.