History
  • No items yet
midpage
Iva Robbins v. Alexandria RHA
16-1329
| 4th Cir. | Dec 19, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Iva Robbins, Ivan Robbins, Appellants Pro Se. David Drake Hudgins, Amanda Murray Schwartz, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs Iva and Ivan Robbins appeal the district court’s orders granting the Alexandria Redevelopment and Housing Authority summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, and denying Plaintiffs’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Robbins v. Alexandria Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., No. 1:15-cv- 00839-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2016; Mar. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Iva Robbins v. Alexandria RHA
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 19, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1329
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.