History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cagey, J., Pet v. PennDOT
164 A.3d 459
| Pa. | 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOISSE A. CAGEY AND DALE J. CAGEY, : No. 329 WAL 2016 HER HUSBAND, :

: Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, :

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, :

A COMMONWEALTH AGENCY, :

: Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Has [the] Commonwealth Court improperly expanded this Court’s holding in Dean v. Department of Transportation, 751 A.2d 1130 (Pa. 2000)[,] that the Department has no duty to erect guardrails on Commonwealth real property along Commonwealth agency roadways, by repeatedly holding that when the Department does erect guardrails, it cannot be liable for injuries caused by negligently dangerously designed guardrails?

Case Details

Case Name: Cagey, J., Pet v. PennDOT
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 13, 2016
Citation: 164 A.3d 459
Docket Number: 329 WAL 2016 (Granted)
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.