History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Ellus Larous
671 F. App'x 141
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ellus Larous, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Ellus Larous appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for declaratory relief or immigration departure. We have reviewed the record and Larous’s claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Larous, No. 5:98-cr-00007-F-4 (E.D.N.C. July 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Ellus Larous
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 12, 2016
Citation: 671 F. App'x 141
Docket Number: 16-6976
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.