*2 O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judge.

This appeal concerns the validity of VirnetX Inc.’s (“VirnetX”) U.S. Patent Nos. 7,188,180 (“the ’180 patent”) and 7,987,274 (“the ’274 patent), disclosing technology for establishing secure communication over networks. Apple Inc. (“Apple”) challenged claims of the ’274 patent in two inter partes review proceedings, which were consolidated with IPR2014-00403 (“the 403 proceeding”) and IPR2014- 00404 (“the 404 proceeding”) initiated by Microsoft Corpo- ration on similar grounds. Apple relied principally on U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037 to Provino (“Provino”) and Takahiro Kiuchi & Shigekoto Kaihara, C-HTTP – The Development of a Secure, Closed HTTP-based Network on the Internet (Feb. 1996) (“Kiuchi”), respectively, for each proceeding. Apple also challenged claims of the ’180 patent in two inter partes review proceedings, IPR2014- 00481 (“the 481 proceeding”) and IPR2014-00482 (“the 482 proceeding”), again relying principally on Provino and Kiuchi, respectively. VirnetX now appeals to this court.

After full review of the record and careful considera- tion, we find no error in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“the Board”) claim constructions or findings in the 403 and 481 proceedings. For the reasons given by the Board therein, we find the challenged claims un- patentable over Provino and the additional prior art cited. We do not, therefore, need to reach the merits of the Board’s decisions in the 404 and 482 proceedings.

AFFIRMED