History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charles L. Semko v. State
5D16-996
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Nov 28, 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CHARLES LEE SEMKO,

Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-996 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Citrus County,

Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Charles Lee Semko, Milton, pro se.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and

George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal [1] , we affirm as to all issues raised by Appellant, Charles L. Semko. However, we note a scrivener’s error in the sentence. The trial court orally pronounced that the statutory maximum sentence would be imposed for Count Two *2 (grand theft), which is five years in prison; but the written judgment reflects a sentence of fifteen years for that count. We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to correct this scrivener’s error.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

SAWAYA, TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

2

[1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Case Details

Case Name: Charles L. Semko v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 28, 2016
Docket Number: 5D16-996
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.