A jury convicted Patrick Lamar Adger of murder. During the punishment phase, appellant pleaded true to having two prior felony convictions. After finding the enhancement paragraphs true, the jury assessed punishment at life imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in cases).

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues After reviewing counsel’s brief, appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE Do Not Publish

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47

160099F.U05

JUDGMENT On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-16-00099-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F13-56945-S.

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. Justices Fillmore and Stoddart participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED . Judgment entered November 30, 2016.