History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel Ross v. Maryland State Police
16-1809
| 4th Cir. | Nov 29, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Hubert Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Daniel Hubert Ross appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Ross leave to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. Md. State Police Licensing Div., No. 8:15-cv-01402-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2016 & June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel Ross v. Maryland State Police
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 29, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1809
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.