History
  • No items yet
midpage
John Stritzinger v. Samuel Asiedu
16-1810
| 4th Cir. | Nov 29, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Stritzinger’s pending motions, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stritzinger v. Asiedu, No. 3:15-cv-05111-TLW (D.S.C. June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: John Stritzinger v. Samuel Asiedu
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 29, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1810
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.