History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wellesley Clayton v. M&T Bank
16-1714
| 4th Cir. | Nov 29, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wellesley K. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. Lacey Meredith Moore, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina; Allen Burton Shuford, Mint Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Wellesley K. Clayton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2016). We deny Clayton’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Wellesley Clayton v. M&T Bank
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 29, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1714
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.