History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norman Kerr v. Warden K. Rogers
16-7323
| 4th Cir. | Nov 28, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Alan Kerr, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Gibbs, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v. Rogers, No. 5:16-cv-00278-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016). We deny Kerr’s motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary and deny his motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Norman Kerr v. Warden K. Rogers
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 28, 2016
Docket Number: 16-7323
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.