History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shain Collins v. Harold Clarke
16-6835
| 4th Cir. | Nov 28, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shain Claude Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Shain Claude Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Collins argued in his notice of appeal, and the record suggests, that he did not timely receive notice of the entry of the district court’s order, and further requested a reopening of the appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(A). Because the 30-day appeal period is jurisdictional, Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007), we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether to reopen the time to file an appeal, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

REMANDED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Shain Collins v. Harold Clarke
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 28, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6835
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.