History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Sandra Elliott
16-6904
| 4th Cir. | Nov 28, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. William Miller Gilmore, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorneys, Kimberly Ann Moore, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Sandra Elliott appeals the district court’s order denying her motion seeking a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 and a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 29. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Elliott, No. 5:09-cr-00383-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Sandra Elliott
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 28, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6904
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.