History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kenneth Watford v. United States
670 F. App'x 813
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Wayne Watford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Wayne Watford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Kenneth Watford v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 22, 2016
Citation: 670 F. App'x 813
Docket Number: 16-6810
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.