*1 Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VAUGHN , and SEITZ , Justices.

ORDER

This 21 st day of November 2016, the Court has considered the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record below. We have determined that the Superior Court’s order denying the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reason assigned by the Superior Court in its Order dated July 14, 2016. The appellant is no longer in custody under either sentence for which he sought postconviction relief. ^[1] Thus, his request for relief is moot. ^[2]

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice 2

[1] The appellant was discharged from probation in Cr. ID 91000534DI in February 1992. He was discharged from probation in Cr. ID 9907017204 in February 2010.

[2] Watson v. State , 2015 WL 1456771 (Del. Mar. 30, 2015).