History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starsha Sewell v. American Education Services
16-1761
| 4th Cir. | Nov 16, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Esposito, Thomas Clinton Goodhue, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action raising various claims related to a default student loan. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. American Edu. Servs./PHEAA, No. 8:15-cv-03076-DKC (D. Md. June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Starsha Sewell v. American Education Services
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 16, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1761
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.