History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martha Stevenson v. Ethicon, Incorporated
16-1621
| 4th Cir. | Nov 10, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle, HOUCK & RIGGLE, LLC, Ruston, Louisiana, for Appellants. David B. Thomas, Daniel R. Higginbotham, THOMAS COMBS & SPANN, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Christy Jones, John C. Henegan, Sr., Susana Moore *2 Moldoveanu, BUTLER SNOW, LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Martha M. Stevenson and James Stevenson appeal the district court’s orders dismissing this action for failure to timely effect service of process and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stevenson v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12- cv-02700; 2:12-md-02327 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 26, 2016; May 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Martha Stevenson v. Ethicon, Incorporated
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 10, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1621
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.