History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charles Langham v. United States
16-6252
4th Cir.
Nov 9, 2016
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Langham, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Charles Langham appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his complaint raising claims pursuant to the Federal Torts Claim Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Langham leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. Langham v. United States, No. 5:14-ct-03143-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 27, 2016 & entered Jan. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Charles Langham v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 9, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6252
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.