History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harold Dickson v. the City of Burkburnett, Texas, a Municipality
02-16-00321-CV
| Tex. App. | Nov 3, 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00321-CV HAROLD DICKSON APPELLANT

V. THE CITY OF BURKBURNETT, APPELLEE TEXAS, A MUNICIPALITY

------------ FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 184,528-B ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION [1] AND JUDGMENT

------------ We have considered appellant ’ s “Motion to Dismiss.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

*2 PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 3, 2016

2

[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case Details

Case Name: Harold Dickson v. the City of Burkburnett, Texas, a Municipality
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 3, 2016
Docket Number: 02-16-00321-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.