History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Apodaca
35,666
N.M. Ct. App.
Sep 14, 2016
Check Treatment

*1 VIGIL, Chief Judge. The State has appealed from a suppression order. We previously issued a notice

{1} *2 of proposed summary disposition, in which we proposed to affirm. The State has filed a response with this Court indicating that it does not oppose our proposed summary disposition.

{2} Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated, we affirm. IT IS SO ORDERED .

{3}

__________________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge WE CONCUR:

_____________________________

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

___________________________________

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

2

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Apodaca
Court Name: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 14, 2016
Docket Number: 35,666
Court Abbreviation: N.M. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.