History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peterson v. Baca
35,105
| N.M. Ct. App. | Sep 15, 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO LORRAINE DELORES PETERSON,

Petitioner-Appellee, v. No. 35,105 JULIANNA E. BACA,

Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY David K. Thomson, District Judge

Sommer, Udall, Hardwick, Ahern & Hyatt, P.A.

Kurt A. Sommer

Joseph P. Walsh

Santa Fe, NM

for Appellee

Julianna E. Baca

Albuquerque, NM

Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUTIN, Judge. *2 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of {1} proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

{3}

__________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge WE CONCUR:

_______________________________

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

_______________________________

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

2

Case Details

Case Name: Peterson v. Baca
Court Name: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 15, 2016
Docket Number: 35,105
Court Abbreviation: N.M. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.