History
  • No items yet
midpage
Prime Datum, Inc. v. Baldor Electric Company
16-1051
| Fed. Cir. | Nov 4, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PRIME DATUM, INC., Appellant v.

BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellee ______________________ 2016-1051 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,286.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ J OSEPH L UCCI , Baker & Hostetler LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J OHN F RANK M URPHY , J EB B ACON O BLAK .

P AUL B. H UNT , Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapo- lis, IN, argued for appellee. Also represented by J OSHUA P AUL L ARSEN .

______________________ T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is *2 O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , O’M ALLEY , and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT November 4, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case Details

Case Name: Prime Datum, Inc. v. Baldor Electric Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Nov 4, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1051
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.