History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gwennetta Pratt-Miller v. Craig Patterson
16-1045
| 4th Cir. | Nov 3, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sidney Schupak, LAW OFFICES OF SIDNEY SCHUPAK, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Appellant. Alexander Francuzenko, *2 Broderick Coleman Dunn, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Gwennetta Pratt-Miller and Curtis Dawkins seek to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee but allowing the claims against the remaining Defendant to go forward. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545- 46 (1949). The order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case Details

Case Name: Gwennetta Pratt-Miller v. Craig Patterson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 3, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1045
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.