History
  • No items yet
midpage
James Johnson v. Pierce
670 F. App'x 132
4th Cir.
2016
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Alen Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; Ruth Griggs, WIMBISH GENTILE MCCRAY & ROEBER, Richmond, Virginia; Joel Mark McCray, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

James Alen Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Pierce, No. 2:14-cv-00512-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: James Johnson v. Pierce
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 3, 2016
Citation: 670 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: 16-6142
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.