History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Jan Stevens
670 F. App'x 133
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jan Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Kellen Sean Dwyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Jan Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stevens, No. 1:10-cr-00446-LO-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Jan Stevens
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 3, 2016
Citation: 670 F. App'x 133
Docket Number: 16-6610
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.