History
  • No items yet
midpage
in Re Valero Refining-Texas, LP and Valero Refining Co. Texas
14-16-00601-CV
| Tex. App. | Oct 25, 2016
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed October 25, 2016.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00601-CV IN RE VALERO REFINING-TEXAS, LP AND VALERO REFINING CO.

TEXAS, Relators ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-49459 MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 29, 2016, relators Valero Refining-Texas, LP and Valero Refining Co. Texas filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable William R. Burke, Jr., presiding judge of the 189th District Court of Harris County, to (1) vacate his July 1, 2016 order denying *2 relators’ motion to compel discovery, and (2) allow relators discovery of the portions of the 2013 and 2014 appraisal reports of four refineries that have not been produced.

To obtain mandamus relief, a relator generally must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal . In re Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise.

2

Case Details

Case Name: in Re Valero Refining-Texas, LP and Valero Refining Co. Texas
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 25, 2016
Docket Number: 14-16-00601-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.