History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jerry Lilly, Individually and D/B/A Westar Industries v. Chris Pham, Attorney-In-Fact for Alex Pham
08-16-00135-CV
| Tex. App. | Oct 27, 2016
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § JERRY LILLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND No. 08-16-00135-CV D/B/A WESTAR INDUSTRIES, §

Appeal from Appellant, § 352nd District Court v. § of Tarrant County, Texas CHRIS PHAM, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT § FOR ALEX PHAM, (TC # 352-280346-15)

§ Appellee. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Jerry Lilly, Individually and d/b/a Westar Industries, has failed to file his brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has not filed his brief or an extension motion, and he has not filed any response to the inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). *2 October 27, 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ. - 2 -

Case Details

Case Name: Jerry Lilly, Individually and D/B/A Westar Industries v. Chris Pham, Attorney-In-Fact for Alex Pham
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 27, 2016
Docket Number: 08-16-00135-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.