History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rodriguez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
208 So. 3d 198
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before SUAREZ, C.J., and WELLS and SCALES, JJ.

SUAREZ, C.J.

Appellant Kristine Rodriguez appeals the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission’s dismissal of her appeal from an appeals referee’s decision that she

was not entitled to unemployment benefits. [1] We affirm.

The record establishes that the disqualification decision was issued on November 19, 2015. Appellant was properly notified of the decision and was properly advised of her right to appeal within 20 calendar days of the decision. Appellant did not request review until January 19, 2016, a date well past the time for appeal. On January 28, 2016 Appellant was ordered to show cause why her appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant was again properly advised that she should respond to the order within 10 calendar days. Appellant failed to respond to that order and, as a result, on February 23, 2016 her appeal was dismissed by the Commission on February 23, 2016.

Because Appellant let the time periods for both the appeal and the show cause order run, we affirm the dismissal of her appeal.

Affirmed.

[1] In her Initial Brief Appellant discusses a separate order which required her to repay benefits already paid. However, that order is not the subject of this appeal and we do not address the substance of that order. 2

Case Details

Case Name: Rodriguez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 26, 2016
Citation: 208 So. 3d 198
Docket Number: 16-0569
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.