History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charles Treece v. Carolyn Colvin
16-1394
| 4th Cir. | Oct 25, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Treece, Appellant Pro Se. Maija DiDomenico, Assistant Regional Counsel, Antonia Maria Pfeffer, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Treece appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the Commissioner’s suspension of Treece’s old-age insurance benefits. Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2012); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005).

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Treece v. Colvin, No. 1:14-cv-01077- NCT-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Charles Treece v. Carolyn Colvin
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 25, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1394
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.