History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mark Panowicz v. Sharon Hancock
15-2376
| 4th Cir. | Oct 24, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Panowicz seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for the defendant Sharon L. Hancock, denying leave to amend, and denying his motions for reconsideration and to reopen sovereign immunity issues. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Panowicz v. Hancock, No. 8:11-cv-02417-DKC (D. Md. July 9, 2015; Oct. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Mark Panowicz v. Sharon Hancock
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 24, 2016
Docket Number: 15-2376
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.