History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles Williams
16-6895
| 4th Cir. | Oct 21, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Morris Speight-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his original 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and opening a new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending below. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles Williams
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 21, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6895
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.