History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Anthony Ruffin
670 F. App'x 71
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Ravon Ruffin, Appellant Pro Se. Eric David Goulian, William Glenn Perry, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Anthony Ravon Ruffin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ruffin, No. 4:06-cr-00074-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2016). Ruffin’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Anthony Ruffin
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 21, 2016
Citation: 670 F. App'x 71
Docket Number: 16-6811
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.