History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norman Askew v. Butch Jackson
16-6699
| 4th Cir. | Oct 20, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Ben Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Norman Ben Askew appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askew v. Jackson, No. 5:14-ct-03192-H (E.D.N.C. May 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Norman Askew v. Butch Jackson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 20, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6699
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.