History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Francisco De La Cruz-Trevino
16-40066
| 5th Cir. | Oct 18, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: [*]

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Francisco De La Cruz- Trevino raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001). In Daugherty , we rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and held that “the constitutionality of § 922(g) is not open to question.” Daugherty , 264 F.3d at 518 (internal *2 Case: 16-40066 Document: 00513722144 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

No. 16-40066

quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Francisco De La Cruz-Trevino
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 18, 2016
Docket Number: 16-40066
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.