*1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Mario Contreras has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Contreras has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Contreras’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no *2 Case: 16-40186 Document: 00513722917 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

No. 16-40186

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.