*1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Martinez- Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Mendoza has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected *2 Case: 16-10060 Document: 00513721957 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

No. 16-10060

therein, as well as Martinez-Mendoza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Meartinez-Mendoza’s pro se request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.