History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Kurtis Lowe
15-11122
| 5th Cir. | Oct 18, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: [*]

The attorney appointed to represent Kurtis Keith Lowe has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lowe has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Lowe’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for *2 Case: 15-11122 Document: 00513722276 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

No. 15-11122

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Kurtis Lowe
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 18, 2016
Docket Number: 15-11122
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.