History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Omar Dixon
16-6492
| 4th Cir. | Oct 18, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omar Jermel Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Omar Jermel Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:02-cr-00209-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Omar Dixon
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 18, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6492
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.