History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gary Mullen v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
16-1542
| 4th Cir. | Oct 17, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Alexander Mullen, Appellant Pro Se. Michael S. Barranco, Justin E. Fine, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee U.S. Bank National Association.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Gary Alexander Mullen appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullen v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Assoc., No. 1:15-cv-02640-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Gary Mullen v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 17, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1542
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.