History
  • No items yet
midpage
Joseph Vaughan, II v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
16-1665
4th Cir.
Oct 17, 2016
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph F. Vaughan, II, Katherine M. Vaughan, Appellants Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A..

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Joseph F. Vaughan, II, and Katherine M. Vaughan seek to appeal the district court’s order granting Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order the Vaughans seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case Details

Case Name: Joseph Vaughan, II v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 17, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1665
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.