History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reginald Evans v. Cheryl Stanton
657 F. App'x 223
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Evans, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Reginald Evans appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Evans that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007). Evans has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Reginald Evans v. Cheryl Stanton
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 17, 2016
Citation: 657 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: 16-1710
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.